| |
Title: |
 |
The use and abuse of limits of detection in environmental analytical chemistry |
|
| |
Authors: |
|
Brown, Richard J. C. |
|
| |
Journal: |
|
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL |
|
| |
Year: |
|
2008 |
|
| |
Volume: |
|
8 |
|
| |
Page Range: |
|
796-801 |
|
| |
Article Type: |
|
Opinion Paper |
|
| |
Handling Editor: |
|
Graham V Lees |
|
| |
Domains: |
|
Environmental Chemistry
,
Analytical Chemistry
,
Forensic Science
,
Methods & Protocols
|
|
| |
DOI: |
|
10.1100/tsw.2008.107 |
|
 ?
|
Article clouds not enabled. Press the image to enable for this session.
|
| |
Synopsis: |
|
This article discusses how other criteria, such as sampling volume, can serve to artificially distort the quoted limit of detection, and make comparison between various analytical methods inequitable. |
|
| |
Keywords: |
|
limit of detection, environmental analytical chemistry, performance criteria, measurement method, uncertainty. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
![[Full Text PDF]](../images/pdf.gif "Download Full Text PDF")
[Related TSW Articles]
[Export to EndNote]
[Open Choice]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Abstract |
|
| |
|
|
The limit of detection (LoD) serves as an important method performance measure that is useful for the comparison of measurement techniques and the assessment of likely signal to noise performance, especially in environmental analytical chemistry. However, the LoD is only truly related to the precision characteristics of the analytical instrument employed for the analysis and the content of analyte in the blank sample. This article discusses how other criteria, such as sampling volume, can serve to distort the quoted LoD artificially and make comparison between various analytical methods inequitable. In order to compare LoDs between methods properly, it is necessary to state clearly all of the input parameters relating to the measurements that have been used in the calculation of the LoD. Additionally, the article discusses that the use of LoDs in contexts other than the comparison of the attributes of analytical methods, in particular when reporting analytical results, may be confusing, less informative than quoting the actual result with an accompanying statement of uncertainty, and may act to bias descriptive statistics. |
|
| |
|
|
Related articles in:
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Post Your Comment |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|