Stephen Coleman

Posted 30th October 2009

I have first heard about New German Medicine from a Rabbi, though I'm not Jewish. I have applied its principles and from my personal empirical observations it has amazing results. I'm not a medical doctor, but I have studied ECIWO acupuncture. My professor Yingqing Zhang, an embryologist discovered the bioholgraphic law. That is a bit much to explain here on this forum, but to surmise it simply, every long bone system and organ have a complete set of acupuncture points, which includes the brain. Acupuncture points are "potential" organs or limbs that never developed. When for example if the stomach is ill, every potential stomach point on the body will be tender and swollen which includes the brain. Though Prof. Zhang has not mapped the acupoints in the brain, Dr. Hamer's mapping precisely follows the bioholograhic law, in the typical linear fashion of other organs or limbs.

Stephen Coleman

Posted 30th October 2009

Several years ago, my mother had a heart attack. I quickly ran to her freezer and grabbed a pack of ice. I placed it on the right side of her head, above the ear. I thought to myself: Dr. Hamer had better be right about this! My mother refused my requests to call the ambulance. Within a few minutes my mother was pulling out of shock, her color returned and she sat up. After 20 minutes of holding the ice to the side of her head, it was as if nothing at all had happened. She even commented that she felt better than before the attack started. I was particularly freaked out by this, what if Dr. Hamer was wrong? I went into shock for several days. Gratefully Dr. Hamer was not wrong, or is not a charlatan; my mother lives now 5 years without any complications. No amount of CPR will lessen the swelling within the brain. How many people needlessly die every day from heart attacks with futile attempts at CPR? And if you live you could have broken ribs or a separated sternum. That is much crueler than a simple pack of ice. Not to mention the needless surgeries performed on the coronary system already in the healing phase.

Stephen Coleman

Posted 30th October 2009

Instead of being armchair researchers, or obvious lackeys for the pharmaceutical industry why don't you roll up your sleeves, get dirty and make some mistakes. Try it for yourself, it easy and simple enough for any medical doctor even with 60 years experience to empirically verify that conflicts or traumas affect our health. It must be very sad to be a researcher, searching in vain for cures that will never be found simply because of the abject refusal to admit emotions affect all aspects of our health. Go down the list of non-infections or nutritional diseases, not one has a provable known cause, not one. Yes, the physiology is understood to the molecule, but the cause still eludes us. Why is that? Because you are stuck by a false axiomatic assumption that physical disease must have physical causes.

Stephen Coleman

Posted 29th October 2009

I do have some serious questions about the 4th law. If fungi are associated with endodermic tissue then why do we have fungal skin and nail infections? Also before the advent of surgical hygiene, infections were a major cause or mortality. After proper surgical hygiene became commonplace the mortality rates dropped precipitately. Dr. Hamer claims that nobody dies from infections, but rather from brain edemas. Can it be explained that before hygiene was commonly practiced people's brains swelled more?

Dr. Hahn

Posted 3rd February 2009

Dr. Hamer is right.

P. Rytz

Posted 18th September 2008

Why discuss. Test it !!! Everybody can test the theorie from Dr. Hamer by himself. If you are not to stupid..then you will find out: He his right !!!

Ann de Schutter

Posted 18th March 2008

For more info about the subject look on : www.biologie-totale.org http://www.drevdb.be/ http://www.dentsvivantes.net/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpG7LitgmA4 http://www.athias.net/

Wilfrid Hartnagel

Posted 19th February 2008

Hi, I just landed here on my path of research into Hamer. I'm Wilfrid Hartnagel, owner of www.infoholix.net . I had medical experiences that motivated me to create this holistic medicine directory. I think I should disclose this as it shows that I would like Hamer to be wrong. If he is right then I may as well file my work of the last 5 years under "superstition". I am supporting people like Dr Tullio Simoncini, who has demonstrated that he can kill a cancer tumor with sodium bicarbonate. This would be an entirely unnecessary procedure if Hamer is right and the conflict can be solved by psychotherapeutical means resulting in a destruction of the tumor. Journey Therapy has cured cancer like this. Meridian Energy therapies work on a similar principle and can produce the same results. Qigong energy has cured cancer and Buteyko has done it with breathing. These all work for some people but not for all. My research into Hamer is still in its infancy, I haven't learned yet how his law solves the conflict. I only found out about Hamer's existence a few days ago. I also haven't read law 3 to 5 yet. Stem cell researchers claim that a breast cancer cell cannot turn into a liver cancer cell while metastasis is supposed to do exactly that. Wouldn't it be easy to refute Hamer's laws with scientific means? This should take a few minutes only, you need one case only and it's not a law anymore. It appears that this has not been done, or this whole discussion would not exist. This is exactly what makes me very suspicious and encourages me to believe that Hamer is right, and he can't be refuted. Add what appears to be a hate campaign executed in best German traditional style where defamation replaces scientific argument and you can't help but think that there is no scientific argument against Hamer.

Dr. Theol. Jeffrey D.H. Di Carlo

Posted 7th November 2007

Dear Readers, I have been reading most of the articles on this side about Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer and have to say that some of these people do not have any clue about antisemitism. Did you ever read the books of the Bible, like Jeremiah, 1 and 2 Samuel et.al. ? There you find the worst kind of antisemitism coming from Jehovah himself. Why not sue God for antisemitism? This whole discussion is going out of hand. Some pseudo scientist do not will to want to accept Dr. Hamer's findings. How ignorant! I do not agree with Hamer on his theological views and his evolution views, but when he is scientifically correct, then he is!!! Get a brain for a change!!!

Anne Mayer

Posted 10th September 2007

Beware of the propagandism against Hamer and against alternative theories in medicine. Some "anti-sects" groups and so-called "quackbusters" and "skeptics" are front-groups whose purpose is to spread disinformation about alternative theories using intense propaganda in websites, blogs, internet forums, etc. to confuse the public. They are in almost all the countries, but their influence is stronger in USA and Europe. Some of these quackbusters have been exposed in U.S.A. courts as you may read here: http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html Also, in U.S.A. their plan have been exposed in detail: http://www.bolenreport.net/archives/planof96.htm They attack alternative theories to try to deflect the attention of the deficiencies of conventional health practiques and sell conventional medicine as the only and "scientific" alternative: http://www.noblindmen.com/Is%20US%20Health%20... Don't be fooled by those propagandists. More information about them: http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/quackwatch... http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/ http://www.skeptizismus.de/

ama

Posted 3rd September 2007

Hamer in a letter some days ago attacked some copy-cats: [*QUOTE*] ---------------------------------------------... 1. Das "Germanische" soll weg, damit es später vielleicht "Jüdische Neue Medizin" heißen kann? Und weil das bisher nicht funktioniert hat, firmiert man jetzt schon mal dreist unter dem Zeichen des Davidsterns. ---------------------------------------------... [*/QUOTE*] This is what Hamer describes as "David's Star": http://www.naturnah2007.de/images/berge.jpg at the top right side in this web page: http://www.naturnah2007.de/index.php Hamer's madness, for all clear to see... This is a new domain dedicated to the fight against Europe's most murderous sect of the last decades: http://www.todessekte.de

Cornelia Böhmer

Posted 28th August 2007

Dear Dr. Ventegodt and co-authors,
I have studied your review article named "Rationality and Irrationality in Ryke Geerd Hamer's System for Holistic Treating of Metastatic Cancer" very carefully. The headline already tells the observant reader what your program is. To tell you in advance: I am a woman, who has studied Dr. Hamer's literature in German language very carefully and with conscious perception. I recognize that you are judging Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer already in the headline to be in one part rational and in the other part irrational.
Reading the complete article one finds out, that this judgement is based on a comparison of literature about the "German New Medicine" and the so called "Traditional or Conventional and Contemporary Holistic Medical Theory". The second subject, the Conventional and the Contemporary Holistic Medical Theory, must have been studied very carefully by the authors. The first subject seems to be perceptually blurred. You know, that "being partly irrational" or "publishing partly irrational theories" is a strong negative judgement. And this judging is getting substantiated with half-truth citations. You know that telling the half-truth is one of the most common and most effective methods of manipulation! I'm going to prove my assertion with statements out of your own text!
The German New Medicine is not a "System for Holistic Treatment", as you claim already in the headline. Nor is any part of it a holistic principle! Just because you read in Dr. Hamer's literature the expressions "psyche", "brain" and "related organ" in a context, you pigeon-hole it as "Holistic Medicine". By the way these three parts "psyche", "brain" and "related organ" cannot be translated or equalized with "healing spirit", "mind" and "body"! And whatever is impossible to be pigeon-holed at all, is called idiosyncratic! How scientific!
[continued below]

Cornelia Böhmer

Posted 28th August 2007

[continued from above]
Dr. Hamer himself always refuses the GNM being part of Holistic Medicine. So just because of this you have to prove your statement conscientiously, before claiming the opposite of the originator’s statement. Just the coincidence of three expressions working with (psyche, brain and organ) or may be the holistic talking about self healing ability of living beings under certain conditions might sound similar in the first place, if you are looking superficially at the subject.
Whatever you claim to be found in the theories of Hippokrates, Antonovsky, Maslow or Frankl, which is supposed to be identical with the first or the second biological law of the German New Medicine, cannot be found at all in different summaries about these men's life work.
May be the complete work differs a lot from the summaries! I am sure you can send me and all your recipients a copy of the passages in their texts, where they talk about special biological programs, that are the answer to a serious, highly acute, dramatic and isolating shock, that catches an individual completely off guard, passages, where they say, that all these conditions are necessary to start one of the biological special programs, that the special biological programs start immediately and simultaneously in the psyche, the brain and the corresponding organ, that at the moment of this shock as described, the content(s) of the conflict determine the location of a focus in the brain and the special program in the organ and that the development of the focus in the brain and the development of the special biological program in the organ always run simultaneously!
This is the content of the first biological law of the German New Medicine.
[continued below]

Cornelia Böhmer

Posted 28th August 2007

[continued from above]
Please show me the passages in Antonovsky's, Maslow's, Frankl's and Hippokrates' texts, where they describe exactly this context! If you are talking about the first biological law of the GNM, you've got to take the complete one, not only some ingredients of it! Once you have proved your statements for the first law not being really "new", but found by many others before, we can proceed with the second one in the same way. To be a honest person one cannot reduce the things to be compared to a minimum in order to conclude they were just identical! You are just comparing the lowest common determinators! In this way of scientific thinking a frog and a human being are just the same! They both are living beings! To be on the safe side you have used the expression "these "medical laws" are in agreement with the theories acknowledging by modern holistic medicine". So, if one is examining critically your argumentation, you could argue, that you have never said, that both is alike. You just said they were "in agreement" with each other. But in your summary for example you claim:"it is clear that the most fundamental principles of Hamer's work , the psychosomatic "iron law of cancer" (Hamer's first "law") and the principle of pathogenesis being reversed into salutogenesis (Hamer's second "law") are well established principles of holistic medicine today."..."And in reality [they are] all going back to the father of medicine, Hippokrates" Which principles are established there?! Which rudimentary rest of the GNM's biological laws do you find in your mentioned citations?
[continued below]

Cornelia Böhmer

Posted 28th August 2007

[continued from above]
Playing with words in this way in order to change the original meaning almost imperceptible for the recipients, that are no experts in German New Medicine, is pure MANIPULATION, made to reject people from reading the original literature of Dr. Hamer! Either the "laws" are well established" or they are "in agreement", what means they can be mixed with everything that is mentioned to be part of the holistic mixture.
In this manner your whole article is combining truth with lies and telling the half-truth about Dr. Hamer's literature in almost every sentence. With your article you have given a perfect example to poeple who know the GNM's theory exactly, how manipulation of people's minds is working! You are not talking about the contents of German New Medicine at all, just mixing a few aspects, which you rephrase in order to make them fit to your own theories of life. It doesn't happen by an accident, that 75% of the references you are giving - are just your own writings.
Let me ask you one question:
"What for are you writing an article like this? What is your real aim doing this? Why don't you just work with your own theories based on Hippokrates, Antonovsky, Maslow, Frankl etc.? What for do you need Dr. Hamer and his German New Medicine at all? Please stop confusing people's minds with statements like in this article! Dr. Hamer is still alive and doesn't find himself in agreement with any Holistic Medicine! We all know, that you know this. If you cannot understand the details, you've got to accept the facts at least!
Yours sincerely
Cornelia Böhmer

Jan Spreen

Posted 1st July 2007

Hey Ama, why don't you come out into the open and show your real identity? Did you notice that you're the only person using a pseudo around here? Well, If I were to write dumb statements like you do (Hamer living like a prince in Spain !!! Man, you're really hopping around on the wild side) I wouldn't use my real name either. Anyway, be a man, show who you are and I'd be really glad to wipe the floor with your foul mouthed dummy talk.

Greg Kramer

Posted 26th June 2007

Dear Dr.Ventegodt and Dr. Merrick,
You said: "As we do not read German, we cannot do the extensive review of the Hamer material that is needed to make a fair scientific evaluation of his scientific and clinical work." However, there are books of Dr.Hamer in English (e.g. Summary of the New Medicine): http://www.amazon.com/Summary-Medicine-Ryke-G...
So, the language isn't an excuse. You should study in depth the GNM and then test it empirically at any arbitrary number of cancer patients. To know if the GNM and its empirical predictions are correct or not, we can't use pseudoscientific rhetoric or propaganda techniques. This is irrelevant, from a scientific point of view. We need to test it empirically. If the GNM is false, it's very easy to refute it with only one patient case. This is the only way to settle, once for all, this scientific controversy!.
I consider you honest researchers. Please, take the time to study the GNM and, above all, try to test it empirically and publish the results. You only need to know and understand the GNM, brain CT scans and your own patients.

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 25th June 2007

Dear colleagues,
We are happy that our paper on Hamer’s methods has received so much attention, but also unhappy that the discussion at times seemed to be less than open, objective, scientific and fair.
We do believe that it is a fact that cancer often spreads to other organs (it metastasizes), but things are really not simple in medical science as every type of cancer has its own individual pattern of spreading to other organs. Why is this so? Till this day nobody seems to be able to explain that strange fact. So Hamer could be right to speculate, and he has his right to make an alternative hypothesis, even if it seems strange, controversial and hard to understand. What would science be without creativity and free thoughts unbound by rigid and traditional views?
Until we know for sure what is going on in the body and how it manages its biological information, it seems a little arrogant just to neglect even the strangest hypothesis. And please remember that in science we often see that the strangest theory becomes truth in the end – just think of how Bohr and Einstein’s strange ideas was received in the world of physicists in the last century.
The book by Hamer in Norwegian [used as the basis for our discussion of his work] on his medical principles is a collection of interviews made in a very smart, sober, scientific, and convincing way. It is short, crisp, and businesslike, and therefore good for scientific discussion and critique. It also seemed to us that there was at least some hard evidence that Hamer actually did help a low percentage of the cancer patients that came to him with metastatic cancer and no hope of cure. That finally convinced us to write the paper on Hamer.
(continued below)

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 25th June 2007

(continued from above)
As we do not read German, we cannot do the extensive review of the Hamer-material that is needed to make a fair scientific evaluation of his scientific and clinical work. And maybe that is not our job either.
As the issue of complementary treatment of cancer seems really to interest and concern many people, we do hope that a competent person or group of people with an intimate understanding of both complementary and holistic medicine and the German language, will take the next step into shedding light into this complicated issue.
Thank you for your kind interest in our work and forgive us, if you in the end will find that we have done a less-than-perfect-job with the Hamer-paper.
Sincerely yours,
Søren Ventegodt and Joav Merrick

E.Mohring

Posted 22nd June 2007

Dear Zeller,MD To be 60 years a physician and "scientist" is a sufficient,understandable and acceptable argument NOT to understand the GNM.

P. C. Zeller, MD

Posted 20th June 2007

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Sir,
I refer to the article on the Hamer Medicine (Rationality and Irrationality etc.) by Ventegodt and al. published in TheScientificWorldJournal.
In my opinion, as a longterm physician and scientist (for more than sixty years) and university teacher this article should never have appeared in a publication that calls itself scientific.
The whole paper is solely based on a small book containing interviews with Mr Hamer, a booklet in Norwegian and which no one knows in the rest of Europe. Everything Mr Hamer says there is considered by the authors as the truth and nothing but the truth. The authors did not check the facts, which would have been easy, as Mr Hamer has left a trace of fraud, crime, blood and tears throughout the whole of Europe.
This certainly is not Good Scientific Practice – it simply is unacceptable.
Already the title of the paper is misleading: there is no “Hamer System for Holistic Treatment of Metastatic Cancer”. According to Mr Hamer “Metastases do not exist – they are nothing but an invention by stupid doctors, who then kill their patients with morphium”. According to Mr Hamer “Brain tumors also do not exist”; they cannot exist because their existence would not fit in his system of psyche-brain-body. I remind you of the voluminous works on cancer by DeVita, Zeller/Zur Hausen (oncology) or Noltenius (brain tumor pathology). Hamer maintains that all this (collected and scientifically tested knowledge) is rubbish.
(continued below)

P. C. Zeller, MD

Posted 20th June 2007

(continued from above)
The authors write that Hamer had developed a “testicular carcinoma and that he cured it by his system”. This is not true – Hamer underwent surgery in a Munich clinic. No one knows for sure that it was a carcinoma – as to that we have only his word. In his first (?) book he writes that in exactly that clinic he studied the case reports of other cancer patients and from there got the idea for his system.
When Mr Hamer gives figures, you can never trust him, as the figures change every time according to the necessity of the argument, and the figures are never realistic. Do the authors really believe that Mr Hamer “received his experience from working with more than 10,000 patients”? Where are the data? Why can’t Mr Hamer come up with even one well documented case of a healed patient? Mr Hamer publishes a lot on the Internet, his so-called “verifications” (see the Pilhar pages) but never hard testable data.
Considering this aspect it is cynical when Ventegodt and al. write (p. 99) that “seven survivors out of fifty is a success rate of 15%(sic!).” This number found the authors in a publication by the (Swiss) SCAC, but they cite it in a way that creates the impression the authors had checked the Spiegel article themselves, which they did obviously not. This is not Good Scientific Practice. As the article dates from 1995, it certainly would be interesting to know if these seven patients survived a relevant amount of time after the investigation – or did they die shortly after?
(continued below)

P. C. Zeller, MD

Posted 20th June 2007

(continued from above)
I would like to add a word concerning this “success rate”. When we are talking about the Hamer system, we are not talking about patients with advanced metastatic cancer in a hopeless premortal state! As a matter of fact, we are talking about patients with a freshly diagnosed cancer, but still in a good state of health – patients who would have excellent chances with modern scientific cancer treatment. It is these patients that the Hamer sect tries to shanghai – in the end, as a consequence of the factual non-treatment, there is the moribund and dying patient often brought into clinic, so that they can say after his death in hospital, that he was killed (with morphium or cortisone) by the scientific medicine. Just read Hamer’s first book.
To make you understand, what you have done: On the Internet the Hamer followers now proudly announce that the first two laws have been verified by two university doctors and scientists.
I fear, Mr Ventegodt, that initially you believed to draw advantage out of the seemingly Hamer popularity for your own ideas and propagation of ‘holistic medicine’, but now it is the other way round: Hamer makes YOU a supporter of his own deadly system.

Peter Beimer

Posted 20th June 2007

Wenn jemand wie ama der Meinung ist, daß durch Hamers Germanische Neue Medizin Menschen umgebracht werden und er Totenlisten anlegt, dann möchte man vor solch hilfsbereitem Menschenfreund den Hut ziehen und ihn unterstützen. Nach einigem Nachdenken wird man sich aber fragen, warum ama den umständlichen Weg geht, überall gegen Hamers Anhänger zu hetzen, anstatt den einfacheren Weg zu gehen, sich für eine amtliche Prüfung von Hamers Naturgesetzen einzusetzen. Offenbar befürchtet er, bei einer Prüfung könnten diese Gesetze bestätigt und ihm dadurch die Geschäftsgrundlage entzogen werden. Oder glaubt er etwa, die Schulmediziner hätten eine Bestätigung Hamers zu befürchten und würden sich deshalb einer Überprüfung verweigern? Glaubt er darum, es wäre aussichtslos, sich für eine amtliche Prüfung einzusetzen? Verständlich wäre eine solche Haltung schon, besonders in Anbetracht dessen, daß Prof. Merrick und seine Mitautoren bereits von der Richtigkeit der beiden ersten Hamerschen Gesetze ausgehen. Anscheinend glaubt ama selbst nicht an die Fundiertheit seiner Todeslisten, sonst hielte er es nicht für nötig, sie durch eine Antisemitismuskampagne zu flankieren. Ich wiederhole deshalb meine Frage vom 7. Juni: Meint er etwa, die Chirurgen sollten wieder auf Hygiene verzichten, falls sich herausstellen sollte, daß Semmelweiß ein Antisemit war?

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ham2.htm Tot durch Ryke Geerd Hamer Die Totenliste mehr als 140 Tote... 19.06.2007 Menschen starben. Sie starben wegen Hamer. Doch seine Anhänger hörten nicht auf zu behaupten, daß es durch Hamer keinen einzigen Todesfall gäbe. Hamer's Anhänger verbreiten Lügen, angetrieben durch kriminelle Psychopathen und skrupellose Geschäftemacher, wie Hamer selbst. Auch als Sören Wechselbaum starb, bei dem es ohne jeden Zweifel klar war, daß er wegen Hamer gestorben war, und daß er hätte gerettet werden können, wenn er NICHT auf Hamer gehört hätte, logen Hamer's Anhänger in unverminderter Härte weiter. Deshalb begann ich 2002, die mir bekannten Todesfälle in dieser Liste zusammenzutragen. ********************************* Weiterhin ungeklärt sind ZUSÄTZLICH die von Hamer selbst zugegebenen durch die Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelten 500 TODESFÄLLE in Zusammenhang mit Burgau, Österreich Man sieht an der Liste, dass es sowohl raeumlich als auch zeitlich sehr grosse Luecken gibt, so in der Zeit von 1983 bis 1990, unter anderem aus Hamer's "Klinik" in Katzenelnbogen. Das bedeutet, dass es sehr viel mehr Tote gibt. Wir befuerchten, dass es selbst bei vorsichtigster Schaetzung MINDESTENS 300 Tote sind. Die Todessekte des Ryke Geerd Hamer ist die mit Abstand gefaehrlichste Sekte der letzten Jahrzehnte. Man darf dabei vor allem eines nicht vergessen: dass Aerzte und Heilpraktiker beteiligt sind, die zum Teil auch ohne Nennung des Namens Hamer dessen wahnsinnige Ideen in Geld umsetzen. Menschenleben spielen fuer sie keine Rolle.

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

No Tribute for Ryke Geerd Hamer 29.05.2007 Aribert Deckers In my text "Die Bestialität des Ryke Geerd Hamer" ("The Bestiality of Ryke Geerd Hamer") (http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ha53.htm) I commented these two passages: http://web.archive.org/web/20040307100326/pil... (textmarkers by me) [*QUOTE*] ---------------------------------------------... Und Sie verkündeten mir, dass meine germanische Neue Medizin in Zukunft nur noch für Juden vorbehalten ist, die damit zu 98% überleben dürfen, während meine deutschen nichtjüdischen Landsleute und alle Nichtjuden dieser Welt gezwungen werden sollen, weiter die idiotische jüdische Gutartig-Bösartig-Religionsmedizin mit ihren 5000 Hypothesen zu erdulden, an der man zu 98% an Chemo und Morphium stirbt Dass aber Ihr Weltoberrabbiner Schneerson ausdrücklich angeordnet hat, dass man diese (meine germanische) Neue Medizin allen Nichtjuden gegenüber verschweigen müsse - genau so haben Sie es mir berichtet! - das macht meines Erachtens diesen "messianischen" Weltoberrabbiner zum schlimmsten Massenmörder der Weltgeschichte. Die Anordnung des Weltoberrabbiners haben nicht nur alle Rabbiner der Welt strikt befolgt, sondern alle jüdischen Großlogenmeister der B'nai B'rith haben ihre kleinen Logensklaven Chefärzte und Professoren angewiesen, den Massenmord an den Nichtjuden strikt durchzuführen, [...] ---------------------------------------------... [*/QUOTE*]

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] http://web.archive.org/web/20040307101211/pil... [*QUOTE*] ---------------------------------------------... Denn seit 20 Jahren praktizieren alle Juden dieser Welt auf Geheiß ihrer Rabbiner die Germanischen Neuen Medizinr, während alle Nichtjuden gezwungen werden, die dumme alte Schulmedizin mit ihren 5000 Hypothesen zu praktizieren und sich zu 98% mit Chemo und Morphium umbringen zu lassen. Die dumme sog. Schulmedizin ist eigentlich eine jüdische Medizin. Alles ist eingeteilt in "gutartig und bösartig". Es ist der wahnsinnige Kampf der Talmud-Zionisten in ihrem religiösen Wahn alle Nichtjuden der Welt umbringen zu wollen. ---------------------------------------------... [*/QUOTE*] It is Hamer's bestiality to declare dieing as healing. There are a lot of text passages like those above, in which Hamer attacks "the jews". Now I found that in relation with Rabbi Schneerson, who Hamer refers to again and again, there are some really strange things... To analyse them we started with collecting some of these passages. (See the findings in the appendix.) The pieces found are horrifying, but do not give much clues about the backgrounds. But whilst investigating in a telephone conversation a remark led me to a factum one normally does not get to know. I admit, it took a day before I found the solution. * * * Background of my investigations had been the bizarre adressing of the Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson as "Dr. med.". Hamer even calls Schneerson expressis verbis a "Mediziner". In biographies or hints concerning his professional education I never found anything about a study of medicine, not even about practising as a medical doctor. As far as I know, Menachem Mendel Schneerson is called a mediciner and given the title "Dr. med." solely by Hamer.

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] How can this be? Here as an example a biography (and surely no critical one, look at the file name!): http://www.livius.org/men-mh/messiah/messiah_... (textmarkers by me) [*QUOTE*] ---------------------------------------------... home : index : Judaea : Messiah : article by Jona Lendering © Later Messiahs (7) (©!!!) Menachem Mendel Schneerson Menachem Mendel was born in 1902 in Nikolayev in Ukraine - then a part of tsaristic Russia - as the son of an aristocratic mother and a teacher who was to become the chief rabbi of Yekaterinoslav (Dnepropetrovsk) in 1907. Menachem proved himself to be a clever student of Mosaic Law; when he was twenty-one, he met the spiritual leader of the Lubavitch movement of Chassidic Judaism, rabbi Yosef Yitzchock Schneerson. The two men became closely related, moved to Poland - outside the newly founded Soviet Union - and soon, the young man was the Lubavitcher rebbe's son-in-law. Later, Menachem Mendel Schneerson and his wife settled in Berlin, where he studied mathematics. After the Nazis had come to power in 1933, they had to move again, this time to Paris, from where they were forced to flee in 1940. They finally settled in New York.

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] In 1950, rabbi Yosef Yitzchock Schneerson died; next year, his son-in-law became the new spiritual leader of the small Lubavitch community. Under Menachem's direction, rabbis were sent out to educate the liberal Jews, who, according to the Lubavitcher rebbe, had to be brought back to traditional Judaism. Social service programs contributed to the success of these missionary activities. In the 1980's, the Lubavitcher movement had some 200,000 members worldwide. Some of his followers believed that the Lubavitcher rebbe was the Messiah, a claim that Menachem Mendel Schneerson has neither rejected nor supported. In his own words: "We stand poised at the threshold of a spiritual revolution, a world filled with divine knowledge, the time of the Messiah. A single good deed on your part can transform the world." After the end of the Cold War (1989) and the Second Gulf War (1991), he frequently spoke about the messianic age of peace, enticing his follower to prepare for the coming of the Messiah. In 1994, he died. No successor was appointed because most of his followers expect his early return. Asher Lämmlin (c.1500) Isaac Luria (1534-1573) Hayyim Vital (after 1542) Sabbathai Zwi (1626-1676) Jacob Frank (1726-1786) Moses Guibbory (1899-1985) Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994) ---------------------------------------------... [*/QUOTE*] There are several rabbis with the name Schneerson. So, for identification one must always use the full name including all prenames. The names at the end of the biography are the names of the rabbis of the "Lubavich Jews". There are only 7. And it shall be only 7, because after the death of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson it was decided, that he shall be the last Lubavich Rabbi.

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] There are "some" peculiarities with these Lubavich Jews. The gap of more than 100 years between Jacob Frank (1726-1786) and Moses Guibbory (1899-1985) is one of the harmless ones. I did not believe that Menchem Mendel Schneerson was a medical doctor. The only note concerning his study was, that he had studied mathematics. And some sources say he later worked as an engineer. And then there was this phonecall, in which in on of the Chabad centers I asked for an authoritative answer about what Menachem Mendel Schneerson REALLY had studied and as WHAT he REALLY had worked. I doubted that he had been a medical doctor. There came the anser, yes, but..., he had healed, one had to see this in a spiritual way. Now, that really does it: a rabbi heals ill persons. Of gurus we know these stories, Jesus was working in this metier - and now the Menachem Mendel Schneerson, too... Obviously there was and is a cult about Menachem Mendel Schneerson which outstands many others back by far. This also is shown in a newspaper article, the important part of which I quote: http://www.stljewishlight.com/commentaries/32... (textmarkers by me) [*QUOTE*] ---------------------------------------------... I do not believe that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who died in 1994, was the Moshiach, or Messiah, but it is clear that the Rebbe was, in the words of Rabbi Norman Lamm, a leading Orthodox rabbi, "an indomitable leader, a preeminent scholar and a truly creative visionary of organization."

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] Rabbi Sholom Riskin, a leading Israeli rabbi, in a New York Jewish Week article, said that Rabbi Schneerson was "truly the great leader of this past generation." ---------------------------------------------... [*/QUOTE*] It does not say: "I KNOW, that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson was not the Messiah", no, there is written: "I do not believe that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson was the Messiah." There are worlds in between... This text passage reminded me of the telephone conversation and so gave me THE hint for the real goings-on between Hamer and Schneerson. Fact is: Hamer wrote letters to Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Hamer quotes his own letters. If he really did send them, I do not know. But it complies with his psyche. Fact is: Menachem Mendel Schneerson did not answer Hamer's letters. Hamer complains about that. A fact which I had overlooked until now: Hamer claims that Menachem Mendel Schneerson verified Hamer' "German New Medicine". That is as impossible as a methodist pope. So, what had happened? And above all: From where did Hamer get to know about the "verification"? In his tirades about the evil jew Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the "Weltoberrabbiner" (the world top rabbi), Hamer remarks that a "Rabbi Denoun" had told him that, in the year 1986, in april, on the 27th. day, between 9.oo pm and midnight: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/t... ---------------------------------------------... Sie können ja nicht ableugnen, auch nicht durch Schweigen, was Sie mir am 27.04.1986 zwischen 21 00 Uhr und Mitternacht über Ihren Weltoberrabbiner Dr. med. Menachem Mendel Schneerson verraten haben. ---------------------------------------------...

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] Addressee of this pamphlet is a "Rabbi Denoun". First of all this name is wrong, and second I now talked with this man. When I told him about Hamer's escapades, he was irritated. Fact is: Hamer was called for help as someone was ill with cancer and the family in their desperation grasped for any straws. One had told them about Hamer, so they asked him. Hamer really came. One saw each other once. That was all. Except for 2 letters by the "sister of Hamer", who later asked the family for a confirmation that Hamer had helped the man ill with cancer. They did not answer. But to tell Hamer that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson had verified Hamer's GNM? Irritation. The only thing, which could eventually might have been: that Hamer possibly had seen pictures of Menachem Mendel Schneerson on the wall. And else? Nothing! My first thought had been that someone had pulled a fast one on Hamer. And that Hamer as usual built one of his lie fortresses. But no, here was a family, they had called him, one saw each other once, and that's all. 1986, that is 21 years ago. A long time and each detail of the talk one surely cannot remember - the more because of the sorrow and worries for the deadly ill brother. I believe that during the time Hamer had been there, some words have been spoken - and, perhaps, with some few, irrelevant sentences about who is the person on the pictures. And that he is the spiritual leader of the Lubavich Jews. Exactly THIS is the ignitor. Schneerson had written about the connection between body and soul, about healing of diseases. And - as is in many religions - that "the spirit" heals. And above all: that the belief heals. The point here: that the psyche works on the body. THAT is Hamer's idea. HIS! But here it is proclaimed by a foreigner. By a RABBI! His, Hamer's, the greatest medical man of all times, HIS IDEA!!! THIEVES!

ama

Posted 20th June 2007

[continued] Hamer puts words into other peoples' say. His followers in their naivet´e believe that these others expressis verbis name Hamer and his ideas. But this is not so! Schneerson writes about the psyche and Hamer makes this a "verification". We know about cases like Ernst August Stemmann, who not only is one of the most important devote supporters of Hamer, but also one of the best known epigones, who even copies Hamer word for word. Hamer is happy, as someone is conform with his ideas (hurray, a verification!) and angry, as the "Räuber" (thieve, Hamer's words) does not pay the tribute to THE GENIUS. Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson does not pay tribute to the greatest of all medicine men. He even does not answer his letters... And then there is the utmost impertinence: The god of the Menachem Mendel Schneerson is not the god of Ryke Geerd Hamer - and the god of the Menachem Mendel Schneerson, in the world where the spirit heals, heals only HIS chosen people. Ryke Geerd Hamer is not one of them. He, Ryke Geerd Hamer, is outside the door... Hamer must have been foaming in tantrums... The situation is so bizarre, so utmost mad --- it is killingly funny. * * * The "verification" by the "Weltoberrabbiner" Menachem Mendel Schneerson plus the paranoia, the jews would TAKE the "Holy Medicine" (see "Medicina Sagrada" in Spanish) for them alone, is an example out of the storybook of psychiatry: the little sausage, cockalorum Ryke Geerd Hamer, in his limitless self-overestimation and greedy crave for recognition, lies bolts bent. No anti-semitisme, but ungraspable imbecility, pure jealousy about food.

Caroline Markolin, Ph.D.

Posted 20th June 2007

Dear Dr. Ventegodt: If Dr. Hamer is, as you write, “just another doctor in this ancient line of holistic doctors, who seeks and finds once again back to the roots of medicine, for the sake of all the patients that need us to do so”, WHY has Dr. Hamer then been ridiculed, persecuted, and criminalized for over 25 years? WHY was he stripped of his medical license (in 1986) if he only applied to his patients holistic laws, which have existed for 2,300 years? WHY are the authorities so adamant not to reinstate his license even though his medical findings have never been disproved? (see section about “administrative fraud”, comment Hamer, June 19). On the other hand: WHY do those who “use” (plagiarize!) his discoveries and mix, i.e. dilute them with other modalities under trendy names like “alternative”, “complementary” or “integrative medicine” receive official recognition while Dr. Hamer continues being ostracized? Is there a hidden agenda somewhere? Dr. Hamer’s German New Medicine is much more than just a holistic medicine (a sequel from Hippocrates to Hamer, as you suggest). Dr. Hamer’s medical discoveries are based on UNIVERSAL natural principles. They are founded on the understanding of diseases as innate meaningful special biological programs, including a natural healing phase (provided the related conflict can be resolved). But just like the old orthodox medicine, the modern alternative-integrative-New Medicine cocktail is trying to “cure” an already healing organism, abiding the lucrative doctrine that diseases are caused by external or internal hostile agents that have to be “killed” with every possible means. (continue below)

Caroline Markolin, Ph.D.

Posted 20th June 2007

(continued from above) During this debate, we should always be aware that because of the ongoing suppression of GNM and its take-over since the mid 1980s, millions of patients have died needlessly, and thousands continue to die unnecessarily every day. “For the sake of ALL patients” (to quote your own words), one can only hope that Dr. Hamer’s HUMANE MEDICINE will very soon be endorsed and promoted by EVERYONE, including those who are in a position to combine scientific objectivity with a true sense of responsibility. The well documented 90% success rate of German New Medicine can no longer be denied (for evidence see comment Hamer, May 27). Sincerely, Caroline Markolin

Dr.med.Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 19th June 2007

Dear Dr. Søren Ventegodt: Your letter, for which I thank you, was indeed cordial but I am dismayed that either you have not understood anything concerning German New Medicine - or you pretend that you don't have a clue. In his expert opinion, Professor Niemitz calls traditional medicine an "amorphous hodgepodge of unproven hypotheses". Holistic Medicine is even more than that: namely an amorphous pudding mush of untold more unproven hypotheses which you want to see solidified. Holistic Medicine is a medicine in name only – it has no system at all. In contrast, German New Medicine is a Natural Science without a single hypothesis, and it is verifiable with astronomical exactitude with the next best available patient. So, what does GNM have to do with this amorphous brew of Holistic Medicine such as Acupuncture, Siddha, Yoga, Aromatherapy, Tai-Chi, etc., or with the homeopathy of Hahnemann who wanted to "cure" 95% of his patients in their healing phase with droplets and beads? Absolutely nothing! In the 90's, his disciple Körbler stole my 2nd Biological Natural Law and sold it as "New Homeopathy", in such a way as to give the impression that Hahnemann (Khanemann) actually knew already about it. What you and your friends want to accomplish seems to come in three parts: 1. To hush up the issues of billions of worldwide victims and their responsible mass-murderers. 2. To purposely stir German New Medicine into the unscientific mush of holistic medicine. This way, everything which in GNM is so crystal clear becomes nebulous again, i.e. German New Medicine gets systematically diluted. Of course this is applicable only for non-Jews because, as I already mentioned, Jews have already been practicing pure German New Medicine for at least 23 years. 3. In your efforts to contest my copyrights you actually end up stealing German New Medicine for the Jews along the lines of: German New Medicine was a Jewish discovery. (continued below)

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 19th June 2007

(continued from above) You also rejoiced a little too early when you wrote in your paper: "Hamer is now 70 years old and his professional life finished." To this I can only say: You wait and see - others my age, and even older, managed to become Prime Minister or President. Maybe you and your friends really thought that I would not "survive" the concentration camp in France, or maybe you counted on me, or were even certain, that while jailed I would assign the exclusive rights to German New Medicine to judge Bessy (the highest rabbi in France) and his friends. But you don't know me. Not even 10 years in jail would have prompted me to commit such an act of treason. Just a single thought of the 1500 patients that are slain daily in Germany alone would have sufficed to prevent me from ever becoming such a traitor. Even when (fellow believer?) Robbi Schon revoked my license to practice Medicine 21 years ago, because of my "refusal to recant the New Medicine" and “to convert to traditional medicine", the administration in Frankfurt (Reg. Dir. Diefenbach) has recently confirmed to me in a personal conversation that this had been an injustice equivalent to administrative fraud. Nobody should have had the right to strip me of my license to practice Medicine without proof of the non-validity of German New Medicine. But now this license cannot be given back to me, notwithstanding the fraud, because it would constitute proof that traditional medicine is bogus. (continued below)

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 19th June 2007

(continued from above)Mr. Ventegodt, let's not pretend that German New Medicine has to be verified once more, maybe with the help of the indefinable holistic brew, despite the fact that such verifications have been conducted scientifically and officially some 30 times. Is it you or Prof. Merrick who would conduct this verification of German New Medicine, although you know nothing, and WANT TO KNOW NOTHING about GNM and the scientific verification criteria on the next arbitrary patient’s case? And then you advise me to document my success cases... Please - why not just simply acknowledge that German New Medicine is an exact science. It has no predecessors and functions just as exactly with patients who are dying (when they panic or get relapses) as it does with patients who survive. It simply always works and that applies to ALL 5 Biological Natural Laws. And when you write: “Other medical principles Hamer identified and called “medical laws” unfortunately lack the content and structure that is normally expected from medical science as they do not acknowledge and incorporate the established knowledge of immunology, toxicology, and other medical fields.” I never mentioned "medical laws". They don't even exist - there are only medical hypotheses. I only talk of Biological Natural Laws which do NOT exist in conventional medicine. And neither is there such a thing as medical science - except the scientific German New Medicine - or have you ever seen scientific knowledge regarding immunology - these are all just hypotheses. The name alone is an effrontery and feigns seriousness. If you expected to find with German New Medicine a scientific medicine that would acknowledge the established so-called "knowledge" of traditional medicine and would agree to be combined with the nonsensical hypotheses, then, similar to your holistic mish-mash, it would certainly not be a discovery. (continued below)

Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 19th June 2007

(continued from above) So, let's drop the pretenses. Prof. Merrick and you, along with your fellow believers would not use German New Medicine since 23 years if it had proven to be incorrect. Don't underestimate the non-believers, they are not dumber than the Jews, even if they are good-natured and have a conscience for ALL of humanity. Dr. Ventegodt - no offense – but have you ever heard of truthfulness and honesty? Why don't you and Prof. Merrick have the courage to say: "Yes, German New Medicine is correct - we have been practicing it for 23 years and with a 98% cancer success rate. It is regrettable that we have to follow the Talmud and Rebbe Schneerson's directives to withhold German New Medicine from Non-Jews. We see our error and agree to make amends!" If you would give such honest testimonial for your religious community, then in the future practically nobody would have to die of cancer any more. With best regards, Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer

E.Möhring

Posted 19th June 2007

Dear Dr.Soren Ventegodt,
Thank you very much for your answer. Unfortunately,i do not see an exact answer to my questions. Your answer takes a direction related only to holistic medicine.
I, as a medical student, do not study holistic medicine, nor it is taught at the University. I am not very keen on holistic methods. Holistic medicine is also not welcomed by my medical professors ...
But If holistic medicine is approved and recognized nowadays and earlier as you maintain, for what is Dr. Hamer persecuted and why do NO holistic practitioners know "his" laws and NO practitioner at all is ALLOWED to use them on their patients?
It is a simple question; it does not need a long explanation.
Thank you in advance.

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 19th June 2007

Dear Dr. Emanuel Moering,
Until about 1900 organic chemistry had not been sufficiently developed to give us all the drugs we have to day; the biochemical revolution during the 20th century gave us penicillin and receptor-specific designer drugs, and these drugs dramatically empowered the doctor to significantly impact the state of the patient. So around 1950 most doctors came to believe that the psychological and social dimensions of medicine were of much less importance than biochemistry when treating a patient. This caused a major shift in the focus of medical science, and medicine turned from being “holistic medicine” - looking at the person as a whole - into “biomedicine”, treating with drugs.
So from 1950 the medical faculties of the universities of the world almost abandoned psycho-social strategies and biomedicine was given all the prestige and money for research.
The priority of the money for research meant a slow scientific development of issues relevant for holistic medicine and holistic health awareness like psychosocial medicine, quality of life, and sense of coherence. Only around 1990-2000 had enough evidence gathered to document that lifestyle, health attitudes, happiness, and philosophy of life might be extremely important for a person’s health. In this period the use of complementary and psychosocial medicine - now becoming “alternative” - simply exploded. To day there are more consultations with complementary medicine than biomedicine in the USA, and this development is also happening in Europe now.
(continued below)

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 19th June 2007

(continued from above)
But strong financial interests and a strong lobby have allowing industry and industry-friendly people to impact the policymaking of many European governments. Recent laws have made many types of complementary medicine illegal - comp. the fight around homeopathy used to day by more than 10% of the doctors of the planet. Its medical practitioners have in some cases been sent to jail, or have lost their license, or their jobs. One recent way that complementary medicine has been repressed is by demanding that treatment results must be documented in the same way as the pharmaceutical companies are documenting their results - that is controlling against placebo.
But as a psychosocial intervention mostly is sheer placebo - the positive effect of a shift in patient’s consciousness towards being positive, constructive and present - this design is robbing the holistic medicine of its fruits. Testing homeopathy the way penicillin is tested is going to kill this old and noble art, as the developing a person’s character - the essence of homeopathy in my understanding - is sheer placebo. But nevertheless it seems to be highly effective medicine and has been so since Hippocrates and his students introduced the scientific character-medicine 2300 years ago. Most interestingly, the science of holistic medicine is now beginning to understand WHY this is so healthy to step into character as a person (comp. our seven papers on Life Mission Theory as one example of theory shedding light into this complicated field.).
(continued below)

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 19th June 2007

(continued from above)
To solve the problem of documenting the effect of holistic medicine our group has turned an old design for documenting the effect of a medical treatment - also going back to Hahnemann and further back to Hippocrates - into science. We have called this method the “Square curve paradigm”. The idea is that you measure the state of physical and mental health of a chronic patient - as this is experienced by the patient - before and after the treatment, and if there is a significant and positive difference i.e. a treatment effect, you measure the patient’s state aging after one year or so. If the effect is still there - if the patient feels cured by your treatment - and if you agree as a doctor - you can say that you have helped the patient. A temporary improvement is of little value, and an improvement that you appreciate as a doctor that is not appreciated much by the patient is of little value.
I would personally like all kinds of medicine - biomedicine, holistic medicine, and complementary medicine - to be tested this way, using the patient’s own experience of being cured as the key to documenting success of treatment. I really like the concept of evidence-based medicine very much - especially because I am working with holistic medicine where every therapist seem to think that there own method is superior while it often is not - because only by scientific investigation we can approach the truth in a useful manner.
So, Dr. Emanuel Moering, this was a long answer to your question. And it was my personal view on the matter, not really a scientific one but more a philosophical and political perspective. But I still hope you can agree to at least a part of it.
Sincerely yours,
Søren Ventegodt

Peter Beimer

Posted 13th June 2007

Lieber Herr Graham Lees, ich freue mich, daß Sie die versehentlich gelöschte Stellungnahme von Dr. Hamer wieder eingestellt haben und möchte Ihnen und Herrn Dr. Søren Vendegodt herzlich dafür danken, daß Sie hier eine sachliche und dem Thema angemessene Diskussion ermöglichen.

E.Möhring

Posted 12th June 2007

Dear Dr.Soren Vendegodt,
If these holistic laws have existed for 2,300 years, why do patients nowadays and always only actually receive nothing but chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal treatment, etc? Why did nobody teach me these laws during my medical studies?
If Dr. Hamer is just the next doctor that found these laws, why all the theater around him all these years? Why the persecution? For what? For finding existing laws? If many doctors have found the laws to be correct why are not doctors using them everywhere since???
Can you answer just WHY?
Thank you in advance, Emanuel Moehring

Graham V Lees

Posted 11th June 2007

Research in Dr. Hamer’s work has been extremely difficult, as none of it has been published in Medline indexed journals. If you go to www.pubmed.gov today there is only one hit if you search for "Ryke Geerd Hamer", and it is this paper in TSWJ. Naturally the first Medline-indexed scientific paper on Hamer is raising debate about his work, and this is how it should be, and we are happy for it. But the debate about Dr. Hamer in this blog is now heated up and in many ways not at all scientific but mere opinions and seemingly undocumented accusations. As publisher I am supposed to peer-review and cancel all non-scientific and invalid remarks on TSWJ’s website. As the number of comments has grown immensely, this is no longer possible for me. I therefore have to choose between deleting all remarks or letting them all stay. I have, for the sake of free speech, chosen to let all comments stay on the website, and let the debate be totally free. I have also restored earlier comments from Dr. Hamer which I earlier deleted. They are now out of sequence but dated in the text. Dr Hamer’s comments posted on 2 June 2007 should be taken in the context of MY deleting of his comments (it was not Dr. Merrick’s decision). (continued below)

Graham V Lees

Posted 11th June 2007

(continued) I am also making the article Open Access so that people can actually read it before commenting on it. I request that every participant in the debate reveal his or her true identity including profession and professional qualifications – this goes for “ama” as well. May I remind everybody that there are laws regulating what you are allowed to say about each other? I request every participant in the debate to be honest and truthful, and to discriminate strongly between what are facts and what is opinion. And, finally, I request that Dr. Hamer makes a review for us of all the studies made trying to validate or falsify his treatment – but only including studies not made by himself – to be published in TSWJ. Just claiming that something works is not enough in science, please document it thoroughly. If you want to submit a paper documenting your own work to TSWJ we will be most happy to receive it for peer-review; naturally it must meet scientific standard. So, please let the debate go on, in a decent and respectful way. We are all seeking the truth for the benefit of medicine and all future patients. And Dr. Hamer might have discovered something significant. I am not qualified to judge. I hereby declare that the comments on this website do not reflect the opinion of the Journal or the authors of the Hamer paper, but only the author of the comment. Graham Lees, PhD Founding Editor & Publisher 11 June 2007

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 11th June 2007

Dear Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer Thank you so much for your contribution to the important discussion of your work on this web-site. Please understand that we try our best to assume a neutral, objective and scientific position, just evaluating your work according to known theory and experience in the field of complementary and holistic medicine. I am so happy to see that you wrote: "I am neither racist nor anti-Semitic. I cannot be bribed. I am only the tribune of all patients - Jews and non-Jews alike." Because this is what medicine is about, is it not: helping our patients, not discrimination anybody for political, financial or other reasons? But then, when you write: "We all have the right to have our health restored with German New Medicine." I feel somewhat concerned. Holistic medicine wasn't invented by us; it is a long tradition going all the way back to Hippocrates. I recently found time to read the about 57 books of "Corpus Hippocraticum" and it already describes the holistic laws of healing - including the two first of your five principles - and that was about 2300 years ago. So from my perspective, and please forgive me for that, you have been courageous and successful enough to re-discover these fundamental laws of healing. But they were also known by Hahneman, Heering and other fine doctors a hundred years ago, who used these laws to create the medical system of homeopathy. Freud built psychoanalysis on them. Antonovsky also re-discovered them - and he called the holistic healing salutogenesis. And our group did also re-discover them (I wrote my first draft of a hypothesis on the possibility of holistic medicine and existential healing in 1986, at that time a university student, and felt like discovering a new planet! I used the phrase "quality of life as medicine"), not knowing in the beginning that this was old knowledge. (continued below)

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 11th June 2007

(continued) Dr. Lindström might have discovered the laws of healing, even before he understood that Antonovsky had found them. Dr. Merrick and Dr. Omar also found these laws independently of the literature, just from their own clinical experiences, I believe. We were all - as you were - astonished over the powers and efficiency of these laws, when taken to holistic medical practice. And some of us were admittedly sad to learn that we were not the brilliant pioneers that we believed ourselves to be for a while, but only good doctors with sound medical reason able to find again the ancient roots of holistic medicine. Many of us and other doctors working today with the principles of holistic healing have had at times even severe problems because we followed our hearts and not mainstream medicine. We received critique by colleagues, who did not quite understand our work, for not following the ordinary, established path of biomedicine. But our sufferings, no matter how severe and how unjust, must never turn into pride, and blindness for what other fine men before us have accomplished. I feel that it is important for the sake of medicine itself that we understand and acknowledge that wisdom has a sad tendency to be forgotten and dispersed, and most luckily also a tendency to be re-found by devoted men and thus to reappear. Thus the original medicine is once again, but in a new form and a new wrap, brought to the society that is open for it and to the people who believes in it and desperate needs it. So I sincerely wish for you, Dr. Hamer, in the deepest respect for your work, that you will acknowledge that you are just another doctor in this ancient line of holistic doctors, who seeks and finds once again back to the roots of medicine, for the sake of all the patients that needs us to do so. Sincerely yours, Søren Ventegodt, MMedSci, EU-MSc of complementary, psychosocial and integrative health sciences 6 June 2007

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) Dear Gentlemen: Since I have been so often ''commented on'', allow me, for once, to have my say. For me it is incomprehensible that professors who have ostensibly spent much time to thoroughly acquaint themselves with German New Medicine would write such fuzzy, confused nonsense and on such low level to boot. Yet, they do know that the "Iron Rule of Cancer", as it was called back then, and the Law of the Two Phases of all Meaningful Special Biological Programs have universal acceptance, as Professor Merrick has recently confirmed. Of course they have universal acceptance because already since 1984 they are commented on in the Talmud and are compulsory for all Jews. Admittedly, at that time we had only those two Biological Natural Laws. As Chief Rabbi Denoun of the Lubavitsch movement assured me in 1986 in Paris, this verification had been carried out at that time by Rabbi Dr. med. Menachem Mendel Schneerson known as the Rebbe (spiritual leader). Together with his staff of Rabbinical physicians, most of whom had previously and later taken part in a series of my seminars in Chambery, he discovered that the New Medicine (now German New Medicine) was without any doubt accurate. Based on these findings, he wrote the accompanying commentary in the Talmud. However, since then German New Medicine has 3 further Biological Natural Laws that logically derive from the first two Natural Laws. Yet, these are questioned - see discussion between Merrick, Ventegodt, Ranshaw, Waltering, Woodring and Castillo, Markolin [continue my comments below]

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) (continued) It is mind-boggling to see that a bunch of mature professors cannot achieve in many months what one can accomplish in three days (according to the testimony of Professor Voigt, Dean and Neuroradiologist at the University of Tübingen, 1986 in court), that is to verify the 5 Biological Natural Laws - through reproduction on the next patient's case. I really have trouble to grasp all this nonsense: 1. that there are no such things as Hamer Foci and that these are all artifacts. Any competent radiologist with CT equipment can establish within a few minutes what is a Hamer Focus in conflict activity and what is an artifact (they too exist, after all). All he would need to do is to shift a patient''s head 5 cm from the center line of the apparatus. An artifact always stays in the middle line of the apparatus and shows through all layers. The Hamer Focus on the other hand always remains at the specific brain location where it biologically belongs [continue below Hamer comment part 2 - 6]

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) Hamer comment part 2. that something is wrong with the figure of 6000 survivors (of 6500 patients) that had passed through the Burgau Centre. In the meantime, I have been fortunate to obtain copies of all patients' records from the Office of the District Attorney of Vienna Neustadt. It is absolutely correct that more than 90% of the desperately ill patients survived 4-5 years. By myself I surely could never have verified this. 3. that, according to Professor Joav Merrick, the "Jewish Intellectual" Aaron Antonovsky published already in 1985 (4 years after Hamer and 1 year after my book "Cancer. Disease of the Soul", 1984) his Pathogenesis and Salutogenesis - and that this should be considered contemporary with Hamer. Also, Rabbi Sabbah of Marseille, the chief robber of my intellectual property, attended my Chambery seminars at least 20 times between 1984 and 1990. Subsequently, he "re-discovered" German New Medicine - without ever acknowledging my authorship. And it was this character who initiated a bogus court case against me, together with his friend, the highest-ranking Rabbi in France and judge in Chambery, François Bessy (friend of the former French President Sarkozy). Their accusation was that 10 years earlier I was supposed to have instigated 4 patients into German New Medicine, solely by their reading of my books - a few days before their death by Chemo - despite the fact that I had not been in France in 13 years. The sentence: 3 years of incarceration. Time and time again, I was urged to recant and surrender German New Medicine (to the Rabbis?). This happened in the largest and most brutal prisons in Europe, Fleury-Merogis, administrated by Jews. [continue Hamer comment part 3]

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) Hamer comment part 3. the incessant chitchat about anti-Semitism. When all the Jew of this world may (even MUST) practice German New Medicine and they then have a 98% chance to survive ... and when Dr. Schneerson decreed in 1984 that non-Jews should be prevented from enjoying the benefits of German New Medicine and (should) succumb to 98% because of Chemo and Morphine - to the tune of 1500 per day in Germany alone ... well, why call this anti-Semitism when my non-Jewish fellow countrymen and women also want to survive with my "German" New Medicine - not just the Jews? Is it uttering anti-Semitism when one expresses this wish and even claims it as one''s right? I am neither racist nor anti-Semitic. I cannot be bribed. I am only the tribune of all patients - Jews and non-Jews alike. We all have the right to have our health restored with German New Medicine. But when I see that Jews have perpetrated the most horrible crime in world history, then I have something against those Jews who pretend everywhere to be the persecuted victims - even when you and your friends would like to see me incarcerated once again for "inciting the public" (prosecuting attorney Cottbus) - to see me muzzled because I am exposing this crime for what it is. [continue Hamer comment part 4]

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) Hamer comment part 4. It is also an indecency trying to indiscriminately throw German New Medicine into the same pot with so-called holistic or complementary medicine, using the rationale: "... it has so many aspects [of it] in accordance with established knowledge of holistic and complementary medicine". You simply cannot mix these, doing this is in fact very dangerous for the patients! "German New Medicine" has existed for the past 26 years and so far it has been officially and publicly verified 30 times. It is a coherent and logical system that comprises not a single hypothesis and it is, for all intents and purposes, in itself complete. One should really no longer doubt that German New Medicine is scientifically accurate - not after 30 verifications - because otherwise the Jewish fellow believers would hardly practice GNM on themselves with 98% success. But all that is even worse: The explicit order of the World Chief Rabbi Schneerson that the New Medicine should be denied to non-Jews (as I was told in 1986 by Rabbi Ben Denoun-Danow Josue in the presence of a witness) reduces this "messianic" World Chief Rabbi to the level of the worst mass murderer of all time. You see, not only did all Rabbis in the world follow his commandments, but all the Jewish oncologists, head physicians and professors had also been instructed to conceal the discoveries of GNM vis-à vis their non-Jewish patients. The same goes for all chief editors of the press and other media who furthermore conducted a historically unequalled knowledge suppression campaign against German New Medicine in general and against me in particular (miracle healer, charlatan, etc.), and this also includes all judges, attorneys, and authorities who collectively co-support this crime. [continue Hamer comment part 5]

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) Hamer comment part 5. The problem - or rather that of the Jewish denomination - is that in the meantime we have come to know about these collusions. Of necessity, that could create a global anti-Semitic sentiment, something they themselves will have to answer for because the Israelis could, due to their covert prohibition of German New Medicine, end up to be shunned by all of humanity for centuries to come. Thus they not only would have to fear the relatives of the victims but also the "Army of the Dead". Since all Jews, including also (Rabbi?) Prof. Merrick, have for 23 years very well known that "German New Medicine" is accurate, and that the brothers and sisters in faith survive their cancer with German New Medicine at a rate approaching 98%, it comes down to fraud and "mass murder" (as Prof. Niemitz formulated it in his testimony). One could also call this a "veritable extermination". As a theologian I know the Talmud and particularly the passages where the hate against the rest of humanity comes to the surface; but I also know that in the Talmud the gravest penalties are prescribed for those whose murder and fraud become known and who have thereby violated the respect and reputation of all Jews in the world. [continue Hamer comment part 6]

Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 11th June 2007

(originally posted 30 May 2007) Hamer comment part 6. Do you think even for one moment that one could prevent the disclosure of this crime against billions of non-Jewish patients by continuing to hush up the truth, falsify German New Medicine, slander or even murder me? It is only a question of time until the ever-expanding resentment of patients or relatives against the fellow believers results in the latter ending up in a tailspin. Personally, I would have thought Jews to be more intelligent. Gentlemen, even if you pretend to be compelled sooner or later to verify German New Medicine for its accuracy - I would be surprised if you have the courage to include my present deliberations in your discussion forum. A wise man told me: You are the only one, who can say it, You are the only one, who may say it, and, You are also the only one, who MUST say it. Sincerely, Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer Specialized in Internal Medicine, banned from practicing for the past 21 years, because of refusal to renounce the "Iron Rule of Cancer" and "non-conforming to conventional medicine".

ama

Posted 10th June 2007

Now we are getting to the point. This is an Open Letter to Mr. Ventegodt, Mr. Andersen, and Mr. Merrick, published today, june 10th., 2007: http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show...

Peter Beimer

Posted 7th June 2007

Im “Abstract” ist von Hamers “medical laws” die Rede. Hamer hat jedoch keine medizinischen Gesetze erlassen, sondern „biologische Gesetze“ formuliert. Medizinische Gesetze unterscheiden sich von biologischen Gesetzen dadurch, daß sie sich nicht zwingend aus der medizinischen Forschung ergeben, sondern auf dem Konsens führender Mediziner beruhen, wohingegen biologische Gesetze der Natur abgeschaut sind und von jedermann geprüft und bestätigt werden können. Wie alle Naturgesetze beruhen auch biologische Gesetze auf höherer Gewalt. Es wäre unsachlich, wollte man sie nur dann akzeptieren, wenn sich ihr Entdecker politisch korrekt verhält. Insofern sind die Beiträge von Ama hier überflüssig und unangebracht. Oder meint er etwa, die Chirurgen sollten wieder auf Hygiene verzichten, falls sich herausstellen sollte, daß Semmelweiß ein Antisemit oder Kinderschänder war? Sorry, ich kann englisch nur leidlich lesen, aber nicht schreiben. Ist jemand so nett und übersetzt meinen Beitrag? Danke!

Emanuel Moehring

Posted 6th June 2007

I do not need proof from Prof Merick or anybody else to believe in the GNM. I have decided to check it myself.And it worked 100%. From the first biological law to the fifth.I tried on me,my family,friends. I am a medical student in the last year.I can differ from reality through facts that happen in front of my eyes and misleading information in my studybooks,never proven,but forced to be reality. The discussion is not nessessary..It is very easy to prove the GNM in a simple cold or eczema. It works.It is simple. The only thing that bothers me is if the mental/emotional niveau of a person is not capable to solve a konflict,what happens then? The patient dies,because he could not solve the problem? People are getting mentaly and emotionaly weaker and this is also a factor that plays a huge role in solving a konflict. My deep bow to Dr.Hamer!

ama

Posted 4th June 2007

Those whop are so stupid to self-diagnose their flatulence as cancer of course have a terrific healing-rate. Mental disorders and severe credophilisme are quite common among the Hamer-followers. If they are bigmouthed enough to convince their listeners that for 10 years now polio is called ALS by "the Schulmedizin", they can make seminars for cash. http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show...

Peter

Posted 4th June 2007

no comment

Winni Fulda

Posted 4th June 2007

Dear Ama, the truth doesn`t need 17 Comments within 2 days from one person, as you did.Look into your heart. What`s wrong with you ?

ama

Posted 4th June 2007

Im Vergleich zum stattlichen sonstigen strafrechtlichen Sündenregister dieses selbsternannten Wunderheilers und Antisemiten, der an die 30 Menschen auf dem Gewissen hat, fällt der Verstoß gegen § 203 StGB allerdings nicht sonderlich ins Gewicht, man vergleiche nur: http://www.freund-im-netz.de/kg/htdocs/pre_pr... http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neue_Medizin Zum Patientengeheimnis aus archivischer Sicht ist der Sammelband einschlägig: Akten betreuter Personen als archivische Aufgabe, Neustadt/Aisch 1997. Unterlagen medizinischen Inhalts, wenn diese im Hochschularchiv der RWTH vorhanden wären, dürften, da sie einem Berufsgeheimnis unterlagen (§ 7 Abs. 2 Archivgesetz NRW), frühestens 60 Jahre nach Entstehung benutzt werden. Die Aufzeichnungen über eine "Behandlung" 1982 der 1984 gestorbenen Patientin also frühestens 2042 (Udo Schäfer, in: Akten betreuter Personen, S. 19f.: es gilt die landesrechtliche Schutzfrist für Unterlagen, die nicht unter Bundesrecht entstanden sind). KlausGraf - am Dienstag, 15. August 2006, 15:29 - Rubrik: Archivrecht Kommentar verfassen KlausGraf meinte am 28. Dez, 11:54: Feedback http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... [*/QUOTE*]

Manuel Möhle

Posted 4th June 2007

Hi Ama! How do you know of all the things you claim? Have you been in Hamer's house? It's a run-down shack! Have you spoken to any of the patients? No? Because most of them survive! How many patients die in the seven years following school medicine treatment? Do you know? Over 95%!!!! All I want to ask every human being is to be scientifically correct! Please! Read the "new medicin" and scientifically prove its falseness. Although I really tried to do so, I couldn't.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

"Hamer for President!" That was the idea of some extreme rightists. And Hamer greedily accepted. http://www.transgallaxys.com/~aktenschrank/de... Look at his hand-written line at the bottom.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

http://www.transgallaxys.com/~aktenschrank/wa... Hamer got between 3000 to more than 20,000 Euros per weekend.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer resides in Spain. Truckloads of ill patients come to him and each leaves about 200 Euros cash. That is the average figure according to what his followers tell. Here is a photograph with more than 100 persons: http://www.transgallaxys.com/~aktenschrank/wa... Hamer got between 300 to more than 20,000 Euros per weekend. He lives like a king in his hideout. And his victims die. Like those on this photograph or those who he "treated" in his clinic "Rosenhof". The German magazine "Stern" uncovered his lies. Hamer claims are outrageous: one of the victims was on his bed, dying, but in the front room his wife had to tell that he was doing well. They had no more money to pay Hamer, so Hamer forced them into this "deal". We have the articles of the "Stern" about this: http://www.ariplex.com/agb/a70205/stern.htm

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

In Memory of Christina Connell http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amachris.htm Christina Connell died in 2006. She is a victim of the USA/Canada-based quack Laker, who persuades his customers tofollow Hamer's idiocy.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

A gigantic fraud is committed in the USA by Hamer's copycats: http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... Several dozen of world famous screen actors were made believe that they support research against breast cancer. The truth: the screen actors are about for PR for the murderous "metamedicine", an insane quackery based on Hamer's idiotic lies.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer claims that he cares about his patients. And that the ycan trust him,m because he keeps their secret. WRONG! Hamer is a liar. Hamer broke the privacy of one of his patients: http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... The only reason why Hamer was not taken into court with that: Because there is no relative of this patient, who already died. The Archivar of the university of Aachen is no relative, so his complaint was rejected by the German justice. WHAT A SHAME!

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer accuses the German justice to have done him wrong when revoking his approbation. The truth is: Hamer ran a clinic of his own. Undisturbed. Just the way he alsway claims that he wants to, but nobdy aloows him to do so. No, Hamer, is a liar. He ran the clinic he way he wanted. The result: people died like flies. The dead bodies were transported at night, so nobody shoud see it. Most were brought across the border as the patients were French. Antoine d'Oncieu, who was a motor for Hamer in France, had organized collecting patients and money. Later, in the Chambery law suits, Hamer states, that he received money from the French association "ASAC", sent to Burgau. And befor that, Hamer received money for Katzenelnbogen. Katzenelnbogen ist is small town where the Hamer "clinic" was in 1985. We have interview with some of his employees of that time: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ha74.htm The sound track of the radio broadcast is 31 MB: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ha73.mp3 Did you know that Hamer went to bed with a patient?

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

This forms is really a shame. Much too small and much too small print, which leads to typos.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer claims that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson verified the "German New Medicine". That is an idiotic lie. Recent recherches revealed that Hamer is driven by plain stuipidity, idiocy and greed, greed, greed. Here is the truth about the case Rabbi Schneerson: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ha75.htm

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer claims that Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson verified the "German New Medicine". That is an idiotic lie. recent recherches revealed that Hamer is driven by plain dutipitiy, idiocy and greed, greed, greed. Here is the truth about the case Rabbi Schneerson: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ha75.htm

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer bases the figure of his survival rate on 2 sources: Marc Frechet in Paris and his own desaster in Burgau. I analyzed Burgau, see previous post. Aribert Deckers analyzed the Marc-Frechet-affaire: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ha59.htm result: Marc Frechet was a liar and forger.

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Hamer's claims about suvirvalrate and verifications are lies. His story about Burgau is nothing but lies. This is the analysis of Burgau:: http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show...

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Because of Hamer hundereds of persons have died. We know of at least 5 oder 6 persons, who will die in the near future because they believe the idiotic lies of Hamer and his helpers. We have a list of 130 dead: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ham2.htm

ama

Posted 3rd June 2007

Man sollte nicht nur an die denken, die wegen Ryke Geerd Hamer tot sind, sondern auch an die, die wegen ihm krank sind und vielleicht schon sehr bald sterben. Natürlich ist es schwer, vorherzusagen, ob jemand tatsächlich sterben wird, aber nach allem, was wir wissen, ist selbst ein rettbarer Fall aussichtslos, wenn die Leute weiterhin dem Hamerschen Irrsinn folgen. Sie werden sterben: * Die Schwiegermutter von Siggi http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... * Leni http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... (Eintrag 16.1.2007) * Waltraud http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... (Eintrag 16.1.2007) * Linda99 http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... (Eintrag 17.1.2007) * kuklaki, die Ehefrau von stratos http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... (Eintrag 5.3.2007) * Freundin von Katja http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/show... (Eintrag 26.3.2007) Wie auch immer es um sie steht, sollte man wenigstens, wenn keine Rettung mehr möglich ist, sie in Frieden und OHNE SCHMERZEN sterben lassen. Man sollte alles tun, um ihnen ein Schicksal wie das von Carmen oder Michaela zu ersparen. Carmen's fate: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ham7.htm Obituary for Michaela: http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amamiche.htm

Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Posted 2nd June 2007

"RED CARD" FOR JOAV MERRICK. The deletion of my letter of May 27 from your forum violates even the most basic rules of scientific fairness - and this regards such a serious cause - one that concerns the fate of millions of patients who could survive with German New Medicine. It now becomes abundantly clear that the article by Merrick et al, dated January 5, 2005, (just when they tried to force me in the Jewish-French prison to sign the surrender of German New Medicine) was nothing but a clumsy effort to covertly appropriate for themselves the two prime Biological Natural Laws of German New Medicine (contained since 23 years in Head Rabbi Schneerson's 1984 annotation of the Talmud) by wanting to stir them into the proverbial soup of holistic/alternative/complementary/conventional medicine - mind you - only for the non-believers because Jews have been practicing “GNM pure” all along, worldwide. Now that he has been unmasked, Merrick has scientifically disqualified himself for all time and has drawn for himself and his friends the "red card" because the worst that one can do in science is to deny an opponent his opinion and to replace valid arguments with brute force. Thereby one has managed to transform "Scientific World" into a cheap farce, a huge bluff! However, the crime remains and now becomes even worse because Merrick and his friends seem to be at a loss to present a single argument. They let my accusations go by unchallenged and thereby accept them as true! In Sport, there is a rule: “He who does not even start has already lost.” In Science, there is another rule: “He who gutlessly flees from an argument, has thereby accepted it.” Such cowardice and lack of character can only be despised.--- Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer, Internist; banned from practicing for the past 21 years because of refusal to renounce the "Iron Rule of Cancer" and "non-conforming to conventional medicine".

Dr. phil. Caroline Markolin

Posted 2nd June 2007

ON MAY 27th, DR. HAMER POSTED ON THIS SITE HIS COMMENTS in regards to the author’s argument that 1. a Hamer Focus is “more likely an artifact”. Dr. Hamer: “Any competent radiologist with CT equipment can establish within a few minutes what is a Hamer Focus in conflict activity and what is an artifact (they too exist, after all). All he would need to do is to shift a patient's head 5 cm from the center line of the apparatus. An artifact always stays in the middle line of the apparatus and shows through all layers. The Hamer Focus on the other hand always remains at the specific brain location where it biologically belongs.” 2. on the argument that ““no case of a cure has been published”. Dr. Hamer: “In the meantime, I have been fortunate to obtain copies of all patients’ records from the Office of the District Attorney of Vienna Neustadt (Austria). It is absolutely correct that more than 90% of the desperately ill patients survived 4-5 years. By myself I surely could never have verified this.” 3. on the incessant accusations of anti-Semitism. – Dr. Hamer began his remarks with: “Since I have been so often 'commented on', allow me, for once, to have my say.” His “say” lasted not more than 48 hours, then it or better he was deleted from the site. The least that could be expected from the editor of a “scientific” journal is to allow everyone to exercise the basic civil right of the freedom of speech.

M. Redecke

Posted 1st June 2007

As everybody with a minimum of medical knowledge can see from his own published CT brain scans (see examples here: http://www.transgallaxys.com/~italix/CT-TAC/) His books (published by himself) are full of typical ring-artifacts diagnosed by Hamer to be a "Dirk Hamer Syndrom". Prof Maximilian Reiser, university of Munich and president of the Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft representing 5400 german radiologists, recognized these "DHS" to be artifacts in a statement that can be seen here: http://www.promed-ev.de/modules/news/article....

M. Redecke

Posted 1st June 2007

Hamer does not realize his own antisemitism. He denied the holocaust as a historic fact at least two times, last time in an interview in 2006 and this is one of the reasons why he is so popular in the right-wing scene in Germany and why he left Spain to hide. In 2005 he even agreed to become one day president of a future "Deutsches Reich" and when he was asked in 1999 why he called his hypotheses "germanic" he answered "because I am proud to be a German".

Edgar Muthmann

Posted 1st June 2007

The school medicine is nevertheless only fearful that it must make their large plate smaller. Dr. Hamer Dr. more hamer ago - the methods are indisputablely successful. If the Hamer methods were finally once accepted, lasted to it all unemployed and wüssest then, as heavy it is to earn its bread.

Søren Ventegodt & Joav Merrick

Posted 7th May 2007

Response to Barbara Ranshaw: A careful reader should notice that we disagree with Dr. Hamar on this important issue. We do take a critical position towards Dr. Hamar's work, but as we find so many aspects of it in accordance with established knowledge of holistic and complementary medicine, we do believe that his complementary system might actually be able to help some [of his] patients - which represents very important progress as most of his patients are metastatic cancer patients judged to be hopelessly sick by biomedicine. If that is the case - if he can cure some of these, even just a small fraction - we most definitely should acknowledge Dr. Hamer for this important step forward. It is so easy to give a critique of a colleague trying out a new path, and we also do believe Dr. Hamar to be completely wrong in several of his assumptions. But without such pioneers as Dr. Hamar daring to learn from observing the unexpected and taking it to radical new-thinking and further into models and new ways of treatment, the whole development of medical science would most certainly stop. Please read our paper again carefully, and let us know if there are some points where we go along with Dr. Hamar where we should not have. We are eager to learn about any mistakes we might have made, and we don't believe that our paper on Dr. Hamar's work will be the final word. Sincerely yours, Søren Ventegodt and Joav Merrick

Barbara Ranshaw

Posted 29th April 2007

The idea that cancer cannot spread from organ to organ is nonsense. When a surgeon is able to removes the an entire tumour intact, he doesn't have to bother with further treatment. If this were, as Hamer would pretend, simply because the patient believes they are cured, then how do rats know they are cured?

Martillo

Posted 31st March 2007

In Germany Dr. Hamer is a well known anti-semitic charlatan which is operating via internet from exile in Spain. He has lost his license to practice medicine in 1986 and spent about two years in German and French prisons (1997 and 2003/2004). Latest developments (as of march 2007): According to latest news published by Helmut Pilhar, his commercial base in Austria, and Antje Scherret, his German commercial phone service operator (both of which are responsible for several dead during the recent years) on march, 10th, 2007, Hamer left Spain. Hamer claims to fear German law enforcement would soon be knocking on his door because of upcoming law suits caused by his antisemitic hatred seeding. Hamer claims to have applied for political asylum in a country he does not name. see: http://www.germannewmedicine.ca/documents/200... Inofficial voices of investigators guess that Italian families and relatives of his victims are after him. By the way: Caroline Markolin PhD is not a medic doctor. She received her PhD in German literature from the University of Salzburg, Austria. For more informations about Hamers decreasing troop of followers and their annual anti-Semitic demonstration and propaganda in Tübingen (Germany) visit http://drhamer.blogspot.com/

A. Waltering

Posted 14th October 2006

The gernam text on the quoted website http://www.pilhar.com/Hamer/NeuMed/Zertif/891... is in no way a certification of Hamer Foci by people of Siemens. L. Castillo tries to fool people that are not able to read the german text. It is just a list of 8 exclusion criteria for calling a structure seen in a CT-Scan an artefact. It calls explicit for a verification of the structure in a corresponding MRT or in a scan from another angle to verify that the structure has an anatomical correlat and is not just an artefact. Hamer never showed this corresponding scans. There is no word in the whole text concerning Hamer Foci or there verification, not one. Another try to fool people by wrong statements. Sorry, didn't work.

Luis Castillo

Posted 13th October 2006

The authors also wrote in the paper that the “Hamer Focus” (the visible impact of the emotional shock on a patient’s brain scan) is “more likely an artifact that Hamer, for lack of other hard evidence of his theory… gave too much importance”. It's a subjetive opinion of the authors, not a conclusion based on objective evidence. The evidence shows that on 22.12.1989, the Medical Technical Division of “Siemens Corporation”, the German CT scanner manufacturer, certified that the ring formations that Dr. Hamer identified are NOT artifacts of the equipment. The original “Siemens document” has also been published and you may read it here: http://www.pilhar.com/Hamer/NeuMed/Zertif/891...

A. Waltering

Posted 12th October 2006

It is always the same phenomenon. Criticize the theses of Hamer and his disciples like C. Markolin (cmarkolin@germannewmedicine.ca) will show up an quote mantra like the same unproven facts and so called "verifications" again and again. So one becomes lost in a maze of lies and fantasies. E.g. the so called verification by the university of Trvana. If you read the original document (german) it is easily understandable, that it is no verification at all but a fake. The director has later even withdrawn his signature because the paper was missused as a provement of verification. And when Hamer has really cured 6000 of 6500 terminal ill cancer patients, where is the prove, it is all hearsay. And what suprisingly even numbers. Why not 9000 out of 10000 - random numbers, no evidence. But sorry - I forgot. All suppressed by the great and worldwide jewish conspiracy (that was irony). You can't have a scientific discussion with Hamer and his adepts because you can't discuss pseudoreligious believes. You can believe or you can't. I don't. I think this is a scientific forum and unless there is no more substantial and sound prove of Hamers theses than the old fairy tales and unproven stories this discussion should be ceased. It is not worth the time and energy.

Dr. Caroline Markolin

Posted 11th October 2006

The authors conclude (in accordance with a Swiss Study Group) that in regards to the practical aspect of Dr. Hamer’s discoveries, “no case of a cure has been published”. Dr. Hamer’s “New Medicine” has a documented success rate of 95 to 98 percent. Ironically, these statistics for Dr. Hamer’s remarkable success rate were delivered by the authorities themselves. When Dr. Hamer was arrested in 1997 for having given three people medical advice without a medical license, the police confiscated his patients’ files and had them analyzed. Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial that, after five years, 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly “terminal” cancer were still alive!

Dr. Caroline Markolin

Posted 11th October 2006

The authors state that Dr. Hamer’s medical discoveries “lack clinical trials testing his method”. Fact is that Dr. Hamer’s findings have been clinically tested and verified through signed documents over 30 times by physicians and professorial associations, including the University of Trvana, Slovakia (11.09.1998). ALL evaluations attested the 100% accuracy of Dr. Hamer’s findings of the “Five Biological Laws”. Many of these verifications have been published also in English. The authors also state that the “Hamer Focus” (the visible impact of the emotional shock on a patient’s brain scan) is “more likely an artifact that Hamer, for lack of other hard evidence of his theory… gave too much importance”. Fact is that on 22.12.1989, the Medical Technical Division of “Siemens Corporation”, the German CT scanner manufacturer, certified that the ring formations that Dr. Hamer identified are NOT artifacts of the equipment. The original “Siemens document” has also been published. By analyzing ten thousands of his patients’ brain scans (so far over 40.000) and comparing them with their medical records and their personal history, Dr. Hamer is the first who can provide scientific evidence that diseases do not originate in an organ/tissue as previously assumed but in the brain as a result of unexpected conflict shocks. The result of his research is a detailed scientific chart (a brain map) that indicates from exactly what area in the brain a specific disease is controlled and to what specific type of conflict the physical symptom is biologically related. Dr. Hamer’s method of brain scan analysis offers a most reliable tool for both diagnosis and prognosis, and is not, as the authors presume, what “Hamer desperately needed to get his position back in the medical society”.

A. Waltering

Posted 8th October 2006

L. Castillo wrote, that the travel of cancerous cells is a suppition, not a fact. A fact is, that there are several studies that have shown tumor cells in the bone marrow of women with breast cancer (Jotsuka et al. 2004) and in the circling blood of this women (Patel et al. 2002). There are even commercial test kits to detect this cells and there is a discussion in the scientific community, if the number of cells correlate with the prognosis of the cancer. Also there are no doubts, that the so called "Hamer Herde" in the Brain-CT are only artefacts. When Hamer did his "studies" in the 80th this artefacts were very common and known to the radiologists. Why has Hamer never proved them in later years with corresponding MRT-Scans or with CCT from other angles. I am nearly sure, he tried, but he never published the negativ results, because that would weaken his theories. I am afraid, L. Castillo's comments are more or less nearly word for word quotes from Hamer's texts (www.pilhar.com), reflecting a standard of knowledge from the 80th. Visit this site if you are able to read german texts. Be invited into a world of delusional ideas. By the way, there are also pictures of the so called Hamer Herd, easily recognisable as artefacts for every normaly scilled physician. A prove of a cured patient, not in a book by Hamer, but by an independent source, would be more convincing to me. As I said, the victims are well documented.

Luis Castillo

Posted 5th October 2006

The authors wrote that "Hamer’s understanding of cancer metastasis was built on these failing principles and therefore not substantiated either" I think Hamer's correct understanding of cancer metastases is built on several FACTS known by traditional medicine, for example: 1)There is no scientific evidence that any cancerous cell of a primary tumor travel via the blood stream or the lymph system to other parts of the body where they cause a secondary cancerous growth The "travel of a cancerous cell" is a supposition, not a fact. 2)Embriology and histology teach us that a cell of specific histological origen can't "mutate" into another cell type. They can never cross the germ layer threshold or mutate their histological structure. 3)We never found, for example, bone cancerous (osteoclastic) cells in the brain as metastases (in case of primary bone cancer), because each organ's cancerous growth respond to specific changes derived of its histological origin. These facts refute the traditional and conventional metastasis theory. They are Dr.Hamer's negative proofs. The positive proofs are: a)The logical proof: If the Hamer's first law is correct (as you seems to accept) , is a logical consequence that new cancerous growths (metastases) can be caused by new biological conflict shocks. b)Empirical proof: in each case of metastases, it may be seen in the brain the correresponding Hamer Herd and, questioning to the patient, we may find the specific and corresponding biological conflict. The empircal proof may be tested anytime, according the rules of the scientific method. So, in my opinion, Dr.Hamer's metastases view is built on logical and empirical grounds Mr. Woodring wrote: "Show me one patient who has been cured from his metastatic cancer by using Hamer´s system" You may read many patients cured from metastasic cancer using Hamer's discoveries studiying his books, specially the book "Celler Dokumentation".

Søren Ventegodt

Posted 14th September 2006

With reference to A. Woodring’s comments below, The authors are in no way supporting a fascist, anti-Semitic, or Nazi position, neither philosophically nor politically. But, it is important to differentiate between a man's scientific contribution and his political attitudes; if we only accepted scientific contributions from people who shared our view of the world, science could soon be a dull enterprise. Dr. Hamer has made an important contribution to holistic medicine because he seemingly has shown the world that even very sick cancer patients can sometimes be cured. We know of spontaneous remissions of cancer - many cases actually from Dr. Úlrik Diges research in Denmark - but we do not yet know how to induce such remissions (please see our papers on Clinical Holistic Medicine and Cancer in TheScientificWorldJOURNAL and TSW Holistic Health & Medicine). Dr. Hamer's work seems to point importantly in this direction. When it comes to Dr. Hamer's merits our paper on his work presents what we found of documentation for the efficiency of his cures. This was actually sufficiently convincing for us to bring it to a wider attention through this article. Our interpretation of the documented material is not quite as positive as Dr. Hamer's own view. Please go though the material yourself and see if you can find errors in our presentation of the data. We will be most happy to correct any errors or misunderstandings on our side. Sincerely yours, The Authors

A. Woodring

Posted 14th September 2006

Quote: "We found his postulate that metastatic cancer patients can be healed [...] by using his system of holistic medicine likely to be true [...]." Show me one patient who has been cured from his metastatic cancer by using Hamer´s system. It is a cynical theory and in the end, when it won´t work always the treating "old school" physicians a responsible for the death of the patients because they treat their pain with morphin or disturb the healing process by telling the patient that he has a carcinoma, which causes a new emotional trauma and prevents healing. Hamer has already spent a few years in a french jail for practising medicine while his approbation as a physician was withdrawn years ago from german authorities. As I asked, show me one he saved - the victims are well documented. In addition, Hamer had a, neo-fascistic view, that the jewish doctors treat their patients after his system, and a jewish conspiracy protects it from being used by non- jewish physicians for non-jewish patients.